http://www.chrispearson.org/pages/articles/content/default.asp
09h14
Friday, 21. November 2008

CONTENT MANAGEMENT

It doesn't seem so long ago when I had to write content for the internal corporate web site - we didn't say intranet then - using a WP package, zip up the files and email them to a character in Canada. When he got around to it he would open the files, copy their content and paste it into formatted HTML pages. Then he put them onto the site. No-one else knew quite what it was that he did to achieve this magic.

That was web publishing. The internet site - there was just the one - was similar but more convoluted and managed by a specialist third-party.

That was 1996. And that was how site content was managed. Then some of us - those judged to be technically competent or web-savvy, at least - were given Microsoft's Web Publishing Wizard and access to small areas of the web site in which we might just be trusted.

I don't think my experiences are atypical, at least of medium- to large-scale organisations, and once the publishing wizard was out in the field the genie was (to continue mixing the metaphors) out of the bottle: Content belonged to its author. And content was set to become a whole lot more complex than slabs of text and some image files.

What is content management?   What is a content management system?
Content management is the process of organising information on a web site:It is a trivial task if the amount of content is small and/or the number of updates to the site is small.

Under these circumstances there is no reason why you can't keep track of it all in your head. But as the number of posts increases and the size of the site grows it will become necessary to at least document what goes where and, increasingly importantly, where that information comes from.

 
Web site map: A simple example
 

What is content?

"Stuff that's on a web server"

That's web pages themselves plus documents, executable programs, image and video files, document files.

What we generally now mean by content management in the context of CMS is slightly different to the basic definition.

In this context we consider content management to be the use of software tools to organise web content. It takes the first generation web development tools (applications with which we are all familiar and we feel at home using them) to the next stage by providing ways to store and index, search, retrieve and present an ever-increasing range of information entities. These entities are data objects like data files, image files and database records.

At the turn of 2002/3 the term content management turned soft, mostly because of the CMS context. Marketing managers want it to mean - bend it to mean - anything that will sell their content management package to you.

A lot of buzzwords - an entire buzz vocabulary, in fact - has been constructed to support the CMS market niche. This is language which is being used to re-mystify a process that, for a few years, had become clear and accessible.

I'm not anti-CMS; I'm pro-CMS but anti-spending loads of money buying technology without ever considering either its necessity or the process.

What now? Where next?

 

 

What is the process?

Like most operational processes, the content management process depends on the environment to which it will be applied. Here are five quite different scenarios

1

For a simple, personal web site the content management process will probably need to address "How do I upload the most recent updates to my home page?"

2

If a group of contributors are collaborating on documentation the process must ensure that documents and web pages are locked while they are being edited by a contributor; it must allow documents to be passed onward for comment or editing and for further additions; it must support some kind of version control to identify which generation given information belongs to and that only current information is presented on the web site

3

An e-business site will need a process which audits applications code changes to ensure that functional upgrades and bug-fixes do what they should; it must allow application errors to be recorded for action

4

There may be legal requirements to maintain records for a period of time (maybe years for some accounting transactions) so the process here must include archiving elements

5

A large organisation like a multi-national enterprise will probably have a web site on which certain business functions are responsible for their own areas of content: Marketing present products; PR, press information and news; legal department, statutory information and so on.

Here a much more complex process must allow each functional area to post information appropriately - The legal detail will probably go straight onto the site, press releases will be reviewed before posting, pricing information will come straight off back-end ERP systems where sales orders are processed

These are intended only as illustrative examples: The important point is that such a diverse world requires an equally diverse range of content management processes.

Some of the processes will benefit from technology and some won't. Of those that require technology only a few will need a bought-in CMS solution. 

What systems are available?
Content management systems: What's available?
 
Top of this page
 

xxx,xxx

copyright ©2000 - 2008 Chris Pearson